Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Salazar's avatar

I feel like children are SUCH a good gauge about disabilities on general. "Given the practically infinite diversity of human minds, how can neurodivergence be usefully defined?" to me as a teacher who was in community with other teachers, autism is obvious, adhd os obvious; dyslexia is obvious. and not because we're diagnosing anything-- but because when youre in tune with children's learning needs you sense when you need to employ different strategies. and PART of that sense is identifying the CLEAR MINORITY need, (isolation vs socialization) (audio visual not understimulation) because its often counterintuitive to the more common way of successfully dealing with child needs.

PART of neurodivergance is a basic shared neurology with others that despite being so similar (like all brains are brains) is SOCIALLY (pedogogically/emotionally) so DISTINCT specifically because it deviates from best practices in a statistically significant way. you must know that that kid is 'special' so that it makes sense to everyone else why youre doing A Thing for them, specifically. The special of special needs is also a minority of needs-based best-practice.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts